I think the efficacy of each school of thought depends on the contex you're in. Immersion schools work because you have no other way out except speaking early and speaking a lot. But having a rigid schedule imposed on you helps. Speaking a lot when moving to another country is also what helps recent transplants integrate. Folk in language-heavy college courses learn the language, while understanding the mechanics of the language better. Self-Administered Mass Immersion makes sense if you're not in a hurry to learn a language and you're basically doing it for fun. But that's just my 2 cents :)
Looking back, I think I tend to start with approach 2 and then as soon as it becomes too boring, I will blend in approach 3. Then once I’m comfortable, I will introduce approach 1.
They seem to complement each other really well when mixed at different stages.
That makes sense, that's actually the process I'm going through with Korean! It took me more than 3 years to feel comfortable speaking. With languages that are more comfortable for me (Italian is very similar to my native language), I skip the approach 2 altogether and just listen a lot... And speak too early and make lots of mistakes 😁 I wouldn't dare do this with a language that uses honorifics, making a rude mistake is too scary!
I loved seeing the different approaches laid out like this! It’s been a while since I really thought about how I study and if it best suits my needs…thanks for this reminder to take a step back and review my methods :)
I think the efficacy of each school of thought depends on the contex you're in. Immersion schools work because you have no other way out except speaking early and speaking a lot. But having a rigid schedule imposed on you helps. Speaking a lot when moving to another country is also what helps recent transplants integrate. Folk in language-heavy college courses learn the language, while understanding the mechanics of the language better. Self-Administered Mass Immersion makes sense if you're not in a hurry to learn a language and you're basically doing it for fun. But that's just my 2 cents :)
Precisely! In the end, it always depends on your goal.
What a great framework!
Looking back, I think I tend to start with approach 2 and then as soon as it becomes too boring, I will blend in approach 3. Then once I’m comfortable, I will introduce approach 1.
They seem to complement each other really well when mixed at different stages.
That makes sense, that's actually the process I'm going through with Korean! It took me more than 3 years to feel comfortable speaking. With languages that are more comfortable for me (Italian is very similar to my native language), I skip the approach 2 altogether and just listen a lot... And speak too early and make lots of mistakes 😁 I wouldn't dare do this with a language that uses honorifics, making a rude mistake is too scary!
I loved seeing the different approaches laid out like this! It’s been a while since I really thought about how I study and if it best suits my needs…thanks for this reminder to take a step back and review my methods :)
Any method is fine, but if it gets you closer to your goal it's even better 😊